Monday, October 25, 2010

A Name Itself is the Pinnacle

Mentioned a Chinaman in the investment is not enough? How much of the 25% is my name covering? Why he does not want or can’t make another project type on the same site instead of a casino? Do I have to sign anything which I wont coz this is sheet-of-bull? Require any proof of transaction/payment from my side which I don’t have?

I don’t know the full extent of application from giving my name as investor in the project. What is known is that providing a name as investor is subjected to liabilities regardless whether it is real or as fabricated investor. Also the Russian law is different than British/Commonwealth law hence important issues exist to be resolved prior to being a foreign investor in Russia. A name itself is the pinnacle of going through and resolving such complexities as proof and willingness of liability. I don’t agree to such liabilities especially since we have nothing to do with the project of such scale (us$2.5 million).

Furthermore, this action might incur suspicion in Malaysia from Bank Negara (Malaysian National Bank) of money laundering activity as well as subject to me being blacklisted in Russia in event that deal is bad (cheating the Russian government etc). So please don’t allow my name to be used as fabricated investor for that US$2.5 million Casino project.

0 comments:

My latest images for sale at Shutterstock:

My most popular images for sale at Shutterstock: